AXWORTHY SETS LAND-MINE TREATY DATE

Surprise move challenges countries reluctant to endorse timetable on banning the explosives
Ottawa Land Mines Conference, Globe & mail Report: 96-10-07 by Murray Campbell


OTTAWA - Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Lloyd Axworthy has sidestepped traditional diplomacy and challenged other countries to sign a treaty that would ban antipersonnel mines.

Mr. Axworthy surprised delegates at an international conference here by announcing on Saturday that Canada will convene another meeting in December 1997 to conclude a pact to forbid the use, production or export of land mines.

The unexpected move was a direct challenge to the United States and several other countries that refused to endorse a timetable. Karl Inderfurth, the deputy leader of the U.S. delegation said immediately after Mr. Axworthy's announcement that the United States is not prepared to set a target date for a ban.

Mr. Axworthy said he decided to introduce unilaterally a timetable for a global ban when it became clear the momentum on the issue would be lost if the Ottawa conference ended up with no target date. A treaty signed next year would come into effect by 2000. "If you don't give yourself a standard to measure, you don't make progress," he told reporters. "You can bury it under rules and all kinds of discussions."

Hew as hailed by the anti-mine activists and many delegates, particularly those representing non-governmental organizations, who gave him a standing ovation and praised him for his leadership.

"You had the courage to call the question," said Jody Williams, co-ordinator of The International Campaign to Ban Landmines.

"This is a very big step forward for humanity" said Chris Moon who lost his right hand and part of his right leg 18 months ago while clearing mines for a British humanitarian organization in Mozambique.

But not every country at the conference seemed set to respond to Canada's challenge.

Fifty countries attended the Ottawa gathering, called by Canada when it became clear in the spring that the traditional United Nations institutions were not responding quickly to the fierce lobbying of non-governmental anti-mine groups that have sprung up in three dozen countries in the past five years.

More than 100 million land mines left over from various conflicts remain in the soil of 64 countries, and more than two million are added every year. About 500 people a week - mostly civilians -- are killed or maimed by mines.

All the countries at the conference had to pledge themselves to the ultimate goal of a global ban on anti-personnel mines. Russia, which has used mines in Chechnya, attended as an observer, while China, Iraq and Israel stayed away.

Many countries would not have sent delegations to Ottawa if the believed the final declaration was going to include a timetable for establishing a global ban.

The United States in particular supports a ban and is sponsoring a resolution to that effect in the UN next month, but has resisted setting an implementation timetable.

In addition, Bill Clinton has reserved the right of the U.S. military to deploy mines in the Korean peninsula until it is satisfied that lethal alternatives exist or that hostilities between North and South Korea have lessened.

Mr. Inderfurth said the United States was not told in advance of Canada's move, but in the best traditions of diplomacy he did not give any hint that this might be considered grandstanding.

"Clearly, all of us attending this conference feel strongly about the subject, and this initiative put on the table by Foreign Minister Axworthy is one that we will look at," he said.

"We want to begin these negotiations right away, so that is not inconsistent with saying how fast they can be concluded." However, he said " December of 1997 may be optimistic."

Mr. Axworthy decided on a target date during a meeting on Friday night with Foreign Affairs officials who argued that there was a "critical mass" of countries that would support Canada.

"What became clear during the conference was that there was an impatience to get going by an awful lot of participants," said Canadian diplomat Ralph Lysyshyn, who chaired the meeting.

In a speech that concluded the conference, Mr. Axworthy went beyond the generalities of the agenda for action agreed upon by other diplomats. He said he felt he had to act or people would leave Ottawa thinking that nothing had been done.

"The challenge is to the governments assembled here to put our rhetoric into action," he told the conference. "We have a straight forward choice We can Ö remove 100 million mines an arm and a leg at a time, or we can act."

Canada will be launching a full-court press to persuade countries to send their foreign ministers to Ottawa in 14 months. An interim follow up to the Ottawa gathering of the past few days is scheduled for Belgium next June.

A draft treaty produced by Austria would likely provide the framework for the ban and Mr. Axworthy said Canada would deal with any nation that wished to attend.

He said it was too early to consider whether a treaty would allow the U.S. to deploy land mines in the demilitarized zone in Korea.

 

What on Earth would you do? / Country Profile / The Canadian / Hot Topic / The Newsroom

Bullets to Buckets / The Killing Fields / The Filomena Phenomenon

Button: Top of the page